Quotable offering
Updated
Rabt's own term, for a real problem
"Plan" is ambiguous. A client cannot buy "Silver" — they buy Silver on NextCare RN3 at 20% co-pay, which has a different premium and different providers from Silver on NAS at nil co-pay. The industry says "plan" for both, and the ambiguity is where quoting errors live.
Why it is derived rather than stored
The naive model is a row per combination: one plan on three networks at two co-pay levels becomes six plan records. Then a benefit changes, and it has to be edited six times, and someone edits five.
A quotable offering is a join instead. The plan variant holds the benefits, the network tiers list the networks it is sold on, the co-pay blocks hold the rate grids. The offerings are computed from those three, so changing a benefit once changes it everywhere it appears and nothing can fall out of step.
What it means at quotation
A comparison lists offerings, not plans. Two columns can carry the same insurer and the same plan name and still be genuinely different things worth showing side by side — which is precisely the comparison a broker is being paid to make.
Where this comes up
Related terms
In Rabt
Every one of these is a field in Rabt
Co-pay, network, age band, waiting period — Rabt holds them as data on the plan, so a quote states them the same way every time and a comparison can line them up.